Responsibility
On this page
In accordance with Luke’s strategy, we use research to create wellbeing and a sustainable future from renewable natural resources. Our research produces value and solutions to our customers and society. We develop our operations and operating models continuously and monitor the quality, responsibility and ethics of our operations.
In all research activities and official duties and as a statistical authority, Luke acts impartially, independently, honestly and responsibly, observing high ethical standards of science. Our activities promote responsibility and the balanced realisation of the different dimensions of sustainability in society.
Luke has identified the five UN Sustainable Development Goals that are most relevant for itself and furthers the achievement of these goals with its research results and other activities. We are committed to following the progress in our selected goals until the end of the current strategy period, 2025.
Principle of responsibility
Luke’s Code of Conduct forms the foundation of all responsible activities at Luke and defines the ethical principles guiding our work. The responsibility of research at Luke is ensured through commitment to the ethical guidelines of The Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK.
Luke aims to build an international, diverse and multidisciplinary work community based on equality and non-discrimination. Luke’s Equality Plan supports the achievement of these objectives and implements the obligations laid down in equality and non-discrimination legislation.
The Research Ethics Committee (formerly the Natural Sciences Ethics Committee) began its operations at Luke in 2021.
Research Ethics Committee
At request, the Research Ethics Committee carries out prior ethical reviews of research involving empirical data collection relating to the environment and living organisms, and issues statements on such research. The basis for the committee’s review is Ethical Principles for Research on the Environment and Organisms, published in 2024.
A planned research project is subject to prior ethical review if it may reasonably be expected to result in significant adverse impacts on:
- endangered species or habitats, valuable cultural environments or biodiversity
- animal welfare or health
- soil or water contamination, or significant emissions into water bodies or soil
- health or safety of the researcher, bystanders or their property.
The aim of the prior review is to modify the research plan so that the research can be carried out responsibly.
Tasks of the Committee
- To maintain the ethical principles and the statement request process for research involving the environment and living organisms
- To carry out prior ethical reviews and, upon request, issue statements on research concerning the environment and nature
- To issue, upon request, statements on the need for prior ethical review of research involving human participants
- To monitor and guide the handling of research ethics issues within its area of responsibility
- To communicate, inform and provide training on matters related to prior ethical review and research ethics
- To report to Luke’s Management
Composition of the Committee
- Head of Unit Sirpa Thessler, Chair
- Research Professor Laura Uusitalo, Vice Chair
- Principal Research Manager Laura Kitti
- Senior Specialist Tiina Kauppinen
- Research Professor Matti Koivula
- Research Manager Kari T. Korhonen
- Team Leader Jaana Kotro
In addition, the following serve as expert members of the Committee:
- Communications Manager Johanna Torkkel
- Senior Legal Counsel Heidi Lindberg
- Senior Specialist Tiina Ikonen
The Committee meets once a month, excluding July. Statements issued by the Committee are available below.
Luke's responsibility goals
| Topic | Goal | Indicators |
| Research responsibility | Our research supports the achievement of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. |
|
| Ethical reviews in natural sciences for experimental research are put into practice. |
| |
| Environmental responsibility | An environmental management system is developed and deployed, covering Luke as a whole. |
|
| Social responsibility | A thriving working community: Luke’s wellbeing programme increases the personnel’s wellbeing at work by developing the working culture. |
|
| Students and professionals see Luke as an attractive employer. |
| |
| Economic responsibility | Increases in external funding ensure a sustainable financial base. |
|
| Luke is engaged in sustainable and responsible procurement. |
| |
| Our customer satisfaction remains high. |
| |
| Our activities support regional wellbeing. |
|